According to the guidance on extremists, which uniformed positions should be informed?

The guidance on informing uniformed positions regarding extremists emphasizes the importance of intelligence and legal oversight in managing extremist threats within the army. The S2, which represents the intelligence officer, plays a critical role in gathering and analyzing information relevant to security and potential threats, including extremist activities. The SJA, or Staff Judge Advocate, provides legal advice and ensures that actions taken are within the framework of military law, thus playing a crucial part in addressing issues related to extremist behavior.

Informing these positions is vital as they have the capability to assess the situation from both an intelligence and legal perspective, enabling effective and lawful responses to any identified extremist behavior. This approach ensures that any emerging threats are dealt with proactively and appropriately, safeguarding the integrity of the military environment.

While other roles listed in the choices may have some indirect involvement with training or policies related to extremism, the direct responsibility for intelligence and legal considerations aligns most closely with the roles of the S2 and SJA.